Creating a logo in Photoshop cannot be enlarged or manipulated in the same manner that an Illustrator based logo can. Photoshop is a bad program to use when creating logos, it will do nothing but cost you time and money. This is another feature InDesign supports, which can be especially useful when dealing with larger documents. Illustrator also doesn’t allow you to automate page numbers. This is a necessary tool when you’re building documents that use templates. Illustrator doesn’t have a way to setup master pages the way that InDesign does.
Illustrator is not ideal for creating multi-page documents and using the program this way would create some drawbacks. Vectors are scalable images that can be sized as small or as large are you need them to be, but look the same when it comes to clarity and resolution. This program is for creating and editing vector-based work such as graphics, logos, and other design elements. Illustrator works off vectors, these are points used to create perfectly smooth lines. Photoshop is known to be able to do so much and be so easy to learn that it is looked at as a one stop shop, but Photoshop is not the best program for all types of artwork and design. Now Photoshop is known to create interface designs, web pages, banner ads, video graphics, and the original use of editing and creating images for print. When the program was developed it was for photographers, but over time the program has grown to help all kinds of artists to do many different kinds of work. Photoshop is designed for editing and creating photos or raster-based art.
Photoshop is raster-based and uses pixels to create images. Photoshop is based on pixels while Illustrator works using vectors. These two programs have a lot in common but their differences are bigger than their similarities. Two fabulous programs utilized strongly by artists is Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator. So, there are the trade offs.The Difference Between Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator
MAC VS PC FOR PHOTOSHOP CS6 MAC
I do almost all of my photoshop and Audition work on Mac and just bring the files I need over to PC where I use Premiere, AE, and Speedgrade. CS6 project files can be used on both mac and pc.
MAC VS PC FOR PHOTOSHOP CS6 PRO
If you went on to Apple's website right now and buit yourself the most kicking mac pro you could, the best video card you could get them to put in it is 3 years old and doesn't use the MPE. I'm currently using a new GTX 670 that way out performs my old Quadro CX in everything but previewing 10-bit color. However, any Nvidia card with CUDA cores can run it, they just have to be added to the list.
MAC VS PC FOR PHOTOSHOP CS6 SERIES
I think only the quadro series by Nvidia is listed under the supported cards for the MPE. What they didn't mention is that there is a hack that can be applied in Windows (possibly in Mac as well, though I haven't heard of such a thing) which tells Premiere that the video card is capable of using the Mercury Playback Engine. The poster above mentioned being weary of what video card you buy to make sure it works with Adobe's new rendering issue (this isn't necessary, but greatly increases general workflow speed, everything from previewing to rendering). PC has more options for hardware and video cards.
Mac CS6 has apple pro res which is just a great intermediate format. However, each has a specific advantage over the other. I have noticed that CS6 is slightly more stable on PC than Mac, but hardly. I use CS6 on both a mac and PC (mac for laptop use and PC for desktop).
0 kommentar(er)
